Commentary RSS Feed Video RSS Feed

What's
Up


Drudge
RushRush Limbaugh
FNCFOX News Channel
NROThe Corner
FRFree Republic
ExaminerExaminer
LucianneLucianne
WTWashington Times
WSWeekly Standard
WSJWSJ
CQCQ
MRCMRC
CNSCNSNews
JWRJewish World Review
NewsMaxNewsMax
WNDWorldNetDaily
RCPRCP
GOPUSAGOPUSA
C-SPAN
Rasmussen











BLOG
ROW
HughHugh Hewitt 2012Race 4 2008 Hillary!The Hillary Project MichelleMichelle Malkin PowerlinePowerline ITMIraqTheModel InstapunditInstapundit LGFLittle Green Footballs David L.David Limbaugh BaroneMichael Barone
FPMDavid Horowitz AtlasAtlas Shrugs B4VB4V AsymmetricAsymmetric HyscienceHyscience RWNRightWingNews RedStateRedState OTBOutside the Beltway MilBlogsMilBlogs TMRThe Minority Report

Monday Feb 18, 2008



Following up on Obamafraud: Leap of Faith...


What is the likelihood, statistically, aside from the obviousness of it all, that those events were indeed random and not in fact planned and staged for Obama supporters' gullible consumption, in their expert production of the "experience" they've so successfully created?





It seems pretty clear a correlation between these events is in order given the frequency in which the "fainter" was frequently one those pre-selected by the Obama campaign and so effectively positioned in the VIP section for their shows. Say, for purposes of absurdity, it's a given that Obama exhorts such excitement it's inevitable somebody is (always) going to faint during his shows - in an arena with 10,000 people, that might put the odds at 1 in 10,000 that any particular individual might faint at random during the show (though of course other factors would apply). But as soon as you add the unlikely coincidence that the same person will also commonly be one of the strategically selected individuals chosen by the campaign in advance to occupy the designated VIP location(s), the odds against such possibility quickly increase - meaning these specially selected individuals, statistically, in fact, should rather have been less likely to faint during Obama's performance than they were of ever being struck by lightning in their lifetime - and by a significant magnitude (rather than more likely). But then further extrapolate that the same thing could (and in fact has) happen(ed) from one event to the next and the likelihood this was not choreographed becomes increasingly unlikely. Then factor the unlikely coincidence that these events commonly and repeatedly took place at the same script time and sequence during these events - that adds another factor; say the target segment is roughly 10 minutes (allowing for applause and his narration for the EMTs, in addition to railing against the WOT) within his 40 minute stump speech, that would add another factor of 1 out of 4 multiplied by each time that the unlikely event took place. Since they're really more like 5 minutes out of 40, factor by 8.


If any incidents could be found that didn't fit the campaign's regular script then another consideration need not be applied, but given the absence of any to date, factor the furthered unlikelihood that "faintings" regularly and/or or only (and/or always!) took place when they fit the script ala those numerous chronicled to date ... but seemingly none can be found; so while that may qualify as absence not being proof to the contrary, that alone could prove a rather significant extra denominator and certainly worthy of factoring - in fact, it's almost too incredible and unfathomable to even begin to contemplate - why weren't there regular and/or real "faintings" left and right, as the laws of probability would dictate? why weren't there ever "faintings" that DIDN'T fit Obama's standard stump script when and/or as they've (all) happened? why didn't these performances ever happen at any events staged by parties other than the Obama campaign? The general laws of statistics would suggest that in order for the purported events depicted in numerous Obamafraud shows recorded thus far to be anything but staged, outright - would mean the actual experiences recorded are just a small snapshot or microcosm of a much bigger picture where Obamadolatrous people were just dropping like flies, falling from the rafters, left and right, here, there, everywhere, always requiring hundreds if not thousands of EMTs - but nothing like that ever seems to have ever been recalled or recorded. Statistically that aspect of things presents a picture that's just too improbable to even begin to consider as even could have ever (EVER!) possibly happened... but this is in fact what extremely wide media coverage recorded as having actually happened!


There is a lot of hyperbole amongst Obamadolaters that his performances are like a rock concert and that this "fainting" phenomenon was simply akin to the Beatles' own shows from the 1960's. Well, if so, then why not more or any real similarity? Beatles' concert footage certainly wasn't scripted like a modern day presidential campaign and didn't resemble anything like this, with such a number of uniquely particular groupings of ever increasing but uniquely qualifying incidents, over and over (at least the number of times factored above). It would be like a few very select women within the Beatles' personal entourage were the (only) ones that fainted and only did so when they were on a few select TV show sets and only at a particular but uniquely common place in one specific song, for example ... AND - further - that it (also) didn't (ever?) happen in any other place(s) or circumstance(s). After all, we'd presumably learn years later, it was triggered by that that backwards masking - "Who Buried John?" ROFLMAO. If not an outright (albeit extremely effective) hoax this Obamafraud "phenomenon" could set the field of statistics back for generations.


Without further analysis (as would be required to compute the truly incredible statistical unlikelihood of such events having repeatedly taken place in such common manner) - consider the likelihood relative to the known statistical probability of being struck by lightning:


Odds of being struck by lightning in a given year (reported deaths + injuries): 1/700,000
Odds of being struck by lightning in a given year (estimated total deaths + injuries): 1/400,000
Odds of being struck in your lifetime (Est. 80 years): 1/5000
Odds you will be affected by someone being struck: (Ten people affected for every one struck) 1/500


Factor in the additional certainty that everything in the Obama campaign is carefully organized and every one of these shows they do is thoroughly scripted and presentation choreographed down to the tiniest little details and that any political machine such as this does not allow for any possibility that any unforeseeable or unplanned random events could in any way derail the master's performance .... seems there's something in that water Obama's handlers always have at the ready to hand out ... or it's just pure Obamafraud live and direct!


And Hillary! thought she was being slick with those cattle futures!


PRIOR POST: Obamafraud: Leap of Faith    



NEXT UP: Healings ... followed by levitations!


FOLLOW-UP: Seattle Post-Intelligencer photographer Joshua Trujillo weighs in - "There are always people that faint. Guaranteed," Trujillo said. "When somebody has to stand at one spot, at a view up front of their candidate, and they wait hours upon hours with no water, no food, it's expected and understandable."


This "explanation" shows the further absurdity of it all - these folks WERE NOT the people who stood hours in line to get the best position - they were pre-selected by the campaign and given tickets ahead of time to occupy the VIP locations. And, yet, for those people who would fit that "explanation", such DID NOT happen. That "explanation" just furthers why it's so statistically likely that these events were an absolute total hoax and completely staged by the Obamafraud campaign.






Looking to reach those who design and influence policy?