Commentary RSS Feed Video RSS Feed

What's
Up


Drudge
RushRush Limbaugh
FNCFOX News Channel
NROThe Corner
FRFree Republic
ExaminerExaminer
LucianneLucianne
WTWashington Times
WSWeekly Standard
WSJWSJ
CQCQ
MRCMRC
CNSCNSNews
JWRJewish World Review
NewsMaxNewsMax
WNDWorldNetDaily
RCPRCP
GOPUSAGOPUSA
C-SPAN
Rasmussen











BLOG
ROW
HughHugh Hewitt 2012Race 4 2008 Hillary!The Hillary Project MichelleMichelle Malkin PowerlinePowerline ITMIraqTheModel InstapunditInstapundit LGFLittle Green Footballs David L.David Limbaugh BaroneMichael Barone
FPMDavid Horowitz AtlasAtlas Shrugs B4VB4V AsymmetricAsymmetric HyscienceHyscience RWNRightWingNews RedStateRedState OTBOutside the Beltway MilBlogsMilBlogs TMRThe Minority Report

Monday Oct 27, 2008

Barack Obama explains his radical Bill Ayers contrived Marxist philopsophy on how he plans to circumvent the U.S. Constitution and institute redistribution of wealth.





Let's go to the tape:


If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court - I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order, and as long as I could pay for it, I'd be OK.

But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of Redistribution of Wealth and serve more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.

And to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical.

It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers and the Constitution. At least this has been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way,

That, generally, the Constitution is a general charter of negative liberties, it says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you. but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.

And that hasn't shifted and one of the one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and the activities on the ground that are able the actual coalitions of power through which you actually bring around redistributive change.

And in some ways we're still suffering from that.




The Founding Fathers were rightly concerned about the ability of governments to rule over the people and reign terror from above - particularly unchecked power, as the Democrats are now seeking, and has typically + historically proven a path to outright rule of corruption. Millions of people have suffered and died at the hands of Marxist revolutionaries the world round over the past hundred years. Obama admires the likes of Che Guevarra, the Castro Brothers and Chavez in Venezuela. Socialists ignore all the terror and death inflicted in the reeducation camps they instituted to force the masses to come into line and we see the formations of these rituals throughout the Obama campaign - whether they be the Marxist revolutionary styled paintings of Obama, redesigned presidential seals or the chanting, near hypnotized crowds at his rallies. And the willingness to dismiss those who don't follow in line, like skeptics in Pennsylvania, as ignorant racists.


Be afraid. Very afraid. As the markets are now. And will continue to be.


HT: Nice Deb


Wizbang: For Obama, the redistribution of wealth is a civil right that the civil rights movement failed to attain. To Barack Obama, the redistribution of wealth is basic "political and economic justice," and one segment of society has the basic right to the money of other segments of society. He's very straight forward about this.





BURTON: Obama Campaign takes aim at FOX News Channel for playing the 2001 audio of Obama explaining "redistributive change". The math is easy but the Obama friendly media has been effective in promoting the idea that Obama can offer 95% of Americans a tax cut when ~40% of American wage earners currently pay no taxes at all.






Looking to reach those who design and influence policy?