Friday’s front-page “news analysis” by New York Times health care reporter Kevin Sack, “ Culture Clash in Medicine ,” dealt with two recent recommendations from quasi-government panels on limiting testing for breast cancer and cervical cancer. The recommendations have caused some outcry as a possible prelude to Obama-care rationing, concerns Sack dismissed as “anger and confusion” and some “political posturing.”
That stance is predictable: Previous front-page Times stories have nudged readers toward rationing with tales of “costly” new heart valves for the 'frail' old, 'wasteful' medicines and 'expensive' new medical procedures that are only worth 'a few months' of extra life.
The Times, which editorially supports universal health care coverage, seems to be trying to soften people up into accepting...